Nuclear Power

I asked ChatGPT to write an introductory paragraph for this series. This is what he wrote:

This series of posts aims to use the Socratic method and deductive logic to examine the truth and validity of mainstream scientific arguments. ChatGPT is an AI language model with a vast knowledge base and impressive ability to understand complex concepts. However, its learning is limited by its programming and the data it has been trained on. While ChatGPT may initially seem persuadable, this is not an accurate characterization of its capabilities. It can recognize logical fallacies and evaluate arguments based on their merits, but it cannot override its algorithms on its own. When presented with arguments that contradict mainstream positions, it may cite the preponderance of evidence supporting those positions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here we find some interesting information about the truth behind nuclear power. The relative dangers involved in nuclear radiation exposure will be covered in a different article.

This ended up being much simpler to understand than I thought it would be. There is only one method this power is generated, it is by the spinning of the turbines, as ChatGPT says, no different than a windmill, which, the power generation in those cases is created by the wind.

This whole concept of adding in the nuclear part of it is completely unnecessary and should make any rational person consider why our overlords would suggest there is a need to burn fossil fuels (which I've never looked into, but wouldn't be surprised if this was not what we are told also, maybe a future post will cover this), or a need to introduce nuclear reactors when this heat can easily be generated electrically just as you do on your kitchen top.

At this point, I became interested in further addressing this mainstream agenda. I only assume global warming is a legitimate thing for the sake of discussion to reach a certain conclusion. Check the global warming post to find out the truth behind that.

Additionally, I want to make clear that I do not in any way believe there is anything harmful at all about nuclear radiation. As shown in the preceding link, an individual named Galen Windsor traveled the country way back in the 70s showing people that the harmful effects we are told about nuclear radiation were lies. If I were to speculate, I would guess that the reason those in charge want us to fear and have made elements like Uranium illegal has something to do with their ability to be a natural source of clean power. Imagine if you could buy a baseball sized rock of uranium for relatively cheap that would power everything in your home for multiple years. Again, that theory is my speculation.

So here again, we find BlackRock, and VanGuard, the same companies who own Google and most of the world's largest news media organizations, also own shares in nearly 60% of the biggest nuclear power plants in the world.

So the same people (BlackRock, VanGuard) promulgating this "global warming crisis" could do something about it but instead choose to tell us we need to eat bugs and give up our gas powered cars for electric ones.

The reality of the situation is, for gas powered cars, they can't just turn the power off remotely, or have any control over where you can and can't go, which is why the push for electric. Electric is far more resource draining and less efficient given the length of time it takes to charge and the relatively shorter distances an electric car can travel compared to a gas-powered one.

Part 14. Global Warming.