Virus Isolation

I asked ChatGPT to write an introductory paragraph for this series. This is what he wrote:

This series of posts aims to use the Socratic method and deductive logic to examine the truth and validity of mainstream scientific arguments. ChatGPT is an AI language model with a vast knowledge base and impressive ability to understand complex concepts. However, its learning is limited by its programming and the data it has been trained on. While ChatGPT may initially seem persuadable, this is not an accurate characterization of its capabilities. It can recognize logical fallacies and evaluate arguments based on their merits, but it cannot override its algorithms on its own. When presented with arguments that contradict mainstream positions, it may cite the preponderance of evidence supporting those positions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Before starting, just throwing this in there to give a quick overview of all the problems GPT suggests are contained in peer-review.

For this line of questioning, these specific questions were taken directly from this webpage here in an article written by Dr. Tom Cowan about a series of questions he has for any virologists willing to provide answers.

Let's find out what ChatGPT says about virus isolation.

Feel free to take these studies back to ChatGPT and question him about them, anyone following this series would already know he is going to end up telling you individually there are problems with each one, however, collectively they provide a "preponderance of evidence".

ChatGPT says it himself, there's no foolproof method for identifying any virus, and there is no direct evidence supporting this idea.

He's starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist, isn't he?

Part 10 Censorship.