Are Statutes and Codes Legitimate?

I asked ChatGPT to write an introductory paragraph for this series. This is what he wrote:

This series of posts aims to use the Socratic method and deductive logic to examine the truth and validity of mainstream scientific arguments. ChatGPT is an AI language model with a vast knowledge base and impressive ability to understand complex concepts. However, its learning is limited by its programming and the data it has been trained on. While ChatGPT may initially seem persuadable, this is not an accurate characterization of its capabilities. It can recognize logical fallacies and evaluate arguments based on their merits, but it cannot override its algorithms on its own. When presented with arguments that contradict mainstream positions, it may cite the preponderance of evidence supporting those positions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's take a lesson in the law from ChatGPT.

Okay, so, statutes and codes are null and void when in conflict with the constitution. The only problem is, if we're in violation of one of these and the legislators have it out for us, they can order police to enact force upon us and still haul us off to jail, wasting our time, potentially causing us physical harm, and forcing us to defend ourselves in court.

Does this sound like a system the people decided upon?

We all need to be sure we know our rights, to not know them, is no different than not having any.

Here's a quick reminder....

Part 12. Rights and Privileges.